Who benefits from demonising the poor?


18/11/12

In an interview with The Observer, LibDem MP Sarah Teather attacks the governments welfare benefit cuts, due in April 2013.

She suggests that the benefit cap is “immoral” and “social divisive.” Agreed.

So why are the Liberal Democrats supporting this government? Sarah Teather suggests that Nick Clegg has done a good job in limiting the cuts but this seems to contradict her view that the cuts will have a devastating impact.

The most telling, and disturbing comment in her interview is:

” the primary motive behind the policy,[cap on benefits] which has strong public support, was a desire to court popularity by unfairly demonising the poor.”

What has public support is an attack on scroungers. An attack that has very little basis in fact. There will always be scroungers but these are few compared to those who rely on benefits because their wages are too low and their rents too high. There is only public support for benefit caps because the narrative “all benefit claimants are scroungers” has been perpetuated by ALL the major parties.  (See previous post)

Tucked away in the “cash” section of the Observer is an article on a new investment fund aimed at making more properties available in London at an affordable rent. Tucked away in this article is the statistic that only 1% of properties to rent are available to people on benefits and that this will get worse from April 2013.

No one within the political mainstream seems to want to address this by suggesting we bring back some form of rent control- the narrative on all sides is that we must cut public spending by attacking the poorest in our society.

Labour have apparently embraced the Living Wage-  a courageous statement that they will tackle high rents would be the obvious next step to making this a fairer country.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

5 responses to “Who benefits from demonising the poor?”

  1. publicserf says :

    Of course, there have not been any actual proposals to implement a living wage – for example, a commitment that they would legislate to increase the minimum wage to living wage levels. All Miliband et al they have done is said they will politely ask employers to pay more. When it comes down to it that there is no distance between this and Boris Johnson’s position in London. It still lets the employers who choose not to listen continue to keep workers at inhumane income levels.

    • overhere1 says :

      I agree- would like to see Labour take a radical position implementing a living wage and rent control and refusing to demonise the poor. Suspect it won’t happen though….!

  2. The Political Idealist says :

    Reblogged this on ThePoliticalIdealist.com and commented:
    The fact is, a large proportion of Housing Benefit claimants are in work. The government would save billions if housing costs were to gently return to realistic levels.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Start Up or Sign On? « Overhere1's Blog - January 3, 2013

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: